The White House controversy exposed Facebook’s blind spot on misinformation
Facebook spokesman Danny Lever said: “We do not support the proposal to address the misinformation and support for the vaccine rollout.” There is no standard definition of vaccine misinformation, and both. False and even true content (often shared by the mainstream media as well) discourages vaccine acceptance, we focus on the consequences. “
Facebook executives, including its chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, have said the company has been committed to removing misinformation about Kovid-19 since the epidemic began. The company said it had leaked more than 18 million pieces of misinformation in Covid 19, although it did not specify the timeframe.
Experts studying anonymous information said that the number of pieces removed by Facebook was not related to how much information was uploaded to the site, or the groups and pages in which people were spreading false information. ۔
“They need to open the black box, which is the architecture of their content ranking and content enhancement. Take this black box and open it for audit by independent researchers and the government, “said Imran, chief executive of the Center for Counter Digital Heat, which is a non-profit aimed at fighting disqualification.” We don’t know. How many Americans are affected by misinformation. “
Mr Ahmed’s group, using publicly available data from Crude Tangle, a Facebook-owned program, found that 12 people were responsible for 65 per cent of the misrepresentation of Cove 19 on Facebook. The White House, including Mr Biden, has revised the figure over the past week. Facebook says this is incorrect, but did not provide details.
Renee Dersta, a misinformation researcher at Stanford’s Internet Observatory, has called on Facebook to release more granular data that would help experts understand that false claims about vaccines are being made inside the country. How specific communities are affected. That information, known as “broad statistics”, basically looks at how broad a statement is, like what percentage of people in a serving society see it.
“The reason that more granular data is needed is that false claims do not spread evenly across all audiences,” Ms. Dersta said. “In order to effectively counter certain false claims, communities that society is looking at, civil society organizations and researchers need a better understanding of what is happening within these groups.”