The best cloud services for high data transfer loads. Cloud Save IT
Many cloud providers charge for data transfer, often for every GB. These costs can be so high that it can be expensive to run data-packed services. If you still want to go to the cloud, can you reduce your bandwidth bill? what we can do?
Data is expensive
Big name cloud providers charge for most of the data, and this is usually unavoidable if you want to use these services. In an effort to be as efficient as possible, providers like AWS micro-template all their pricing, and will charge you exorbitant rates if you want to handle the heavy data load.
AWS Charges $ 0.09 Data hourly charges per GB 8 0.0875 Google Cloud Platform Charges per GB 8 0.08. All incoming data is free, and all data transmitted between local servers in the same zone is generally free, but you will have to pay for it once it is off the Internet. This can be a problem if you are sending terabytes each month.
The big three – AWS, Azure, and GCP – all have offers for dedicated servers, but none of them come with dedicated bandwidth. They may have MBPS connections, but it all lets you spend your money faster.
Unfortunately, the solution is usually to either try to limit your data as much as possible, such as Gizp Compression, or to stop using a big name provider, and use a smaller producer who Compute with bandwidth at a reasonable price.
This may mean that you will not be able to use many of the services that come with advanced cloud providers such as AWS, but if you do not have the money to pay for them, this may not be the first. An option in place.
How much data am I using?
If you do not know how much data you are currently using, you may want to monitor it to determine which services you should use.
There are many Linux utilities to measure this, but
vnstat Lightweight and works well.
sudo apt install vnstat
It will display aggregates on the command line, and can also generate PNGs that indicate data usage.
If you’re on AWS, you can see the use of EC2 and other services in the Cloud Watch Dashboard.
Related: See how much bandwidth your AWS EC2 instances have
AWS is notorious for pricing their data, but in an effort to compete with providers like Digital Ocean (which is easy and receives transaction rates for data), they Launches AWS Litecell, the only saving grace for big name cloud providers.
Litecell is a simplified version of AWS that offers only a few services. However, it still offers arithmetic examples and offered databases, and you can still interface with regular AWS services. It’s basically EC2, but easy with the interface designed for beginners.
Here is the best part. Each instance transmits data transfer data over several months, offering more than just digital ocean to some degree. You will still pay an average fee, but you can always upgrade or purchase additional instances.
Very good? Well, there are some catches. Because it can talk to other AWS resources, AWS does not want you to abuse the service to save money, and include the following clauses in their TOS:
51.3. You may not use Amazon Litecell in a manner intended to avoid data charges from other services (for example, expecting network traffic from the services to the public Internet or other locations or excessive data processing) Weight Loss or Content Delivery Network (CDN) services (in documents), and if you do, we may strangle or suspend your data services or your account Can suspend
It’s very confusing, so it’s not clear what the high-data workload Lightcell can and can’t use.
For most services that use lightcell only, you’re probably fine. The term “other services” also applies to AWS outside of LightSail. If you want to run the Lightcell database, the Lightcell API service, and the Lightcell web server, and it happens that they use a ton of data, you can still do so.
However, if you are thinking of setting up a reverse proxy for direct proxy traffic from EC2, Lambda, S3, or any other service, you will need to think of another solution. This is a clear violation of their TOS and your account may be revoked or closed.
This is a gray area to see if you are allowed to use Lightsell Example to run data processing on external data stores like S3 or RDS For example, if you have a lightcell instance that compressed images in S3 on request, you’ll continue to save data costs compared to using EC2. You are not prohibited from using external AWS services, but if you are using it with the intention of saving money from Lightcell, you may violate it if your use is deemed excessive.
It’s also a bit of a gray area to see if a fully balanced workload is allowed in the light cell. Lightsell involves load balancing individuals at ڈالر 20 a month, but is likely to run ten $ 5 events, each bringing 2 TB of data, and a total of T 70 for 20 TB of data. If you run on EC2, it will cost nearly 2000.
Is using lightcell like this fraud? Maybe not, but AWS can decide that, so if you want to run a data-packed application, proceed with caution. At the end of the day, the OWS will likely decide on a case-by-case basis.
Related: For regular people, Amazon Litecell is AWS
Digital Ocean has basically adapted all of their business models to AWS as opposed to easy to use, with simple fixed prices for all their services. Although they do not have every PAS offer that AWS and other providers may have (e.g. they have no Lambda competitors), they do have the basics, and they Good at getting things right.
Their easy-to-explode events, comparable to AWS Litecell and EC2 T3, provide a ton of data each month with very little restriction. Their cheap examples, less than $ 20, don’t give much data than Lightcell, and the SSD is small, but overall they’re very comparable.
What’s even better is that they don’t charge excessive data for excess data, which is only ڈالر 0.01 per GB, which is eight times cheaper than AWS. Compared to EC2, you will save hundreds every month
They’re also easy to create and destroy, so you’re free to run them in automated groups. However, Digital Ocean has not yet built in auto-scaling support unless you use Coburnets, so you will need it automatically.
It’s definitely cheaper, and will probably work for a lot of businesses, but it may close out a lot of services. If you want premium AWS services like Lambda, you have to pay premium prices.
You can check their product page for the latest listings, but they offer:
- VPS compute with “drops”
- Cubernates, using droplets
- Organize DB using droplets
- “App Platform” service like AWS App Runner
- Then 250 GB Free Deposit 3 0.02 per GB with S3 Compatible Object Store, and 1 TB Transfer Plus $ 0.01 Per extra GB
- Local volumes, such as AWS EBS.
And, unfortunately, nothing more than basic networking and monitoring tools at this point.
Dedicated cloud servers
Some cloud providers, such as dedicated servers, do not charge for every GB of data, and instead give you a dedicated and unlimited connection at a fixed Mbps.
For example, OVH is a provider that focuses on most dedicated machines, and for most instances simply provides unrestricted bandwidth.
This may vary by region, as data transmitted from machines in places like Australia may be limited unless you pay a hefty extra per month. However, it still has 5 TB of traffic, so that’s fine for most people.
Lennox is another provider that offers both shared virtual servers and dedicated machines. Their prices are comparable to Lightcell and Digital Ocean, and offer a few TB transfers per month, as well as several Gbps of address speeds.