Meadows’ book weakens Trump’s resistance January 6 Information: Schiff

  • Mark Meadows claims that his January 6 conversation with Trump is protected by executive privileges.
  • But Meadows outlined his conversation with Trump on January 6 in an upcoming memoir.
  • He may have damaged his argument for withholding information from the January 6 committee, spokesman Adam Chef said.

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows may have weakened his argument for not testifying to the Jan. 6 committee about his conversation with Donald Trump during the Capitol riots as he wrote about it in his new book. Yes, rap Adam Chef told Politico.

Meadows began cooperating partially with the committee this week, providing information and setting a date for the panel to testify. But his lawyer has argued that the scope of what he can discuss is limited by the rules of administrative privilege, which ensures that the president discusses matters confidentially with advisers and officials. Can

But Schiff, a Democrat from California and a member of the Jan. 6 committee, said in his new memo to Trump on Jan. 6 that Meadows had “severely damaged” that argument.

“It is possible that in discussing the events of January 6 in his book, if he does, he is withdrawing from any claim of entitlement. Therefore, it will be very difficult for him to maintain it. “I can’t talk about events. You, but I can talk about them in my book,” the chef told Politico.

In excerpts from his memoirs published this week by The Guardian, Meadows described Trump’s troubled mood as he went to address supporters at the Jan. 6 rally that preceded the Capital riots.

Meadows initially refused to appear before the committee on January 6, and the panel found him guilty of criminal contempt. However, earlier this week Meadows began providing emails and other information and agreed to testify next week.

The committee is likely to use excerpts from Meadows’ book to challenge its claim that it cannot comment on its knowledge of Trump’s behavior during the riots, a key focus of the inquiry.

Trump’s lawyers have argued that all interactions between the former president and his aides on January 6 and other records are protected by executive privileges, but legal experts argue that this principle only applies to those presidents. Those who are in office now, not former presidents.

According to The Guardian, Meadows sought to defend the president’s actions in his memo on January 6, claiming that “a handful of fanatics” were responsible for the violence and chaos.

The committee is likely to ask Meadows about claims by ABC News reporter Jonathan Carl’s new book, which states that Meadows could be involved in Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election results.

Write a Comment