Colorado District of Congress 8 Repartition of Abuse Claims

Until now, Everything is on lineIt is a national non-profit organization affiliated with Democratic National Redistricting Committee, was polite in his comment on issues related to Colorado’s new 8th congressional district Even when she had objections. But in a brief filed today, October 8, with the Colorado Supreme Court, tasked with approving the redistricting map, the gloves were off. organization accuses Colorado Independent Redistricting Commission, which presented the so-called “final” map on September 28, from abusing the process by, among other things, weakening the voting power of Latinos in the region in the name of making the region politically competitive.

Main section of the summary was obtained by Westward She says, “The commission’s adoption of the final plan constituted an underestimation in drawing the boundaries of District 8 in three crucial ways. First, the commission failed to comply with—or even attempt to enforce—the constitutional prohibition against eroding minority electoral influence, approving a map that makes it impossible for the Latino community to Second, while the Committee properly considered the preservation of the communities of interest in its decision to place the new District 8 along the Denver-to-Greeley Corridor, it misused its discretion in applying the criterion of “communities of interest.” by inexplicably excluding the city of Longmont, despite its important common interests with the rest of District 8. Third, the commission abused its discretion in applying the criterion of competitiveness by giving priority to both preventing and preserving the weakening of Latin electoral influence for the communities of interest when drawing Zone 8 boundaries, and failure to adopt or apply a measure of “competitiveness” that complies with the constitutional standard.”

These concerns have been raised in our country August 19 update on the redistricting battle. At the time, Marco Dorado, director of All on Line in Colorado, emphasized the term “communities of interest.” This was a reference to language in Amendments Y and Z, the successful 2018 ballot measures that created the Colorado Independent Redistricting Commissions, whose separate legislative and congressional committees are tasked with making redistricting as fair as possible. According to the amendments, “community of interest” means any group in Colorado that shares one or more core interests that may be a federal subject matter. [or state] The legislative measure consists of a reasonably close population, and therefore consideration should be given to its inclusion within a single district for the purposes of ensuring its fair and effective representation.”

The following are the six primary goals of the Colorado Independent Redistricting Authority:

• Equal population, which justifies every variance, however small, as required by the US Constitution

• To be made up of contiguous geographic areas

• Compliance with the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 and its amendments

• Maintain entire communities of interest and complete political subdivisions, such as provinces, cities, and towns

• Be as compact as reasonably possible

• Maximizing the number of politically competitive regions

Making eighth place a political contender is of paramount importance to Christy Burton Brown, newly elected president of the Colorado Republican Party, and thunderbolt controversy. This week, texts from A Lawsuit Related to Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems defined as Ex-leader of a highly questionable electoral conspiracy group. After confirming the new district in April, it released a statement claiming it was “great news for Colorado and great news for Republicans. Come 2022, the Colorados will send another strong conservative leader to D.C. to fight for our state.”

For his part, Dorado told us that All on the Line believes the committee’s bullet points are listed in descending order of importance, making political competition its lowest priority. The brief emphasizes this point, arguing that elevating competitiveness over the so-called “absolute impediment to weakening the electoral influence of a minority group” is unconstitutional.

Click to enlarge Map submitted to the Colorado Supreme Court on September 28.  The Eighth Congressional District is shown in purple.  - REDISTRICTING.COLORADO.GOV

Map submitted to the Colorado Supreme Court on September 28. The Eighth Congressional District is shown in purple.

Redistricting of constituencies

For Longmont, the brief notes that while the commission was presented with at least one scheme that includes the community in District 8, the concept was rejected “due to competitiveness concerns.”

A statement from Dorado states that All on the Line are not very satisfied with the current map.

“In response to significant public testimony, the Colorado Independent Congressional Districting Committee drew and approved a map that created a new eighth congressional district stretching from Denver’s northern suburbs in western Adams County to Greeley,” he began. “However, failure to consider the electoral influence of minorities—protected in the state constitution—and misprioritizing competition over keeping the communities of interest complete has resulted in the abuse of discretion in drawing the lines of the eighth congressional district. This is unacceptable and in violation of the state constitution.”

He adds, “The commission relied on a flawed legal understanding of both minority electoral influence and competitiveness provisions in the state constitution, creating an eighth district that does not actually create a meaningful opportunity for Latinos to influence elections. Therefore, the state Supreme Court should direct the commission to reassess Boundaries of the Eighth Congressional District.There were several maps considered by the committee, including one with the Eighth Congressional District that would preserve the communities of interest between West Adams County and Greeley, protect the electoral influence of minorities, and adhere to the principles outlined in Amendment Y which were supported by a majority overwhelming by the people of Colorado in 2018.

This fight will heat up quickly. The Colorado Supreme Court will hear oral arguments about the map, and whether the commission misused its discretion, next Tuesday 12 October. A decision on whether to approve the map or return it to the commission for redrawing was undertaken no later than November 1.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *