Bernie Sanders tells home frontrunners to hold on tight
Progressives rally at home privately on Tuesday afternoon and recommitted himself to blocking any effort to separate the bipartisan infrastructure bill from the broader reconciliation package, which includes the bulk of President Joe Biden’s agenda to build back better.
The pledge comes after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Monday threatened to disengage, risking key elements of Biden’s agenda. according to public whip count24 Progressives in the House of Representatives announced their commitment to vote against the infrastructure bill unless it is passed along with the reconciliation bill. Two sources on the call said that at least 10 members of Congress not on the list, during the meeting, spoke in support of the strategy, vowing to vote “no” on Thursday if the bipartisan bill comes up.
In response to questions from The American Prospect, The Intercept, and The Daily Poster, a few members of the Congressional Progressive bloc, including Representatives Raul Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat, and Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, announced themselves at the fence to the vote. Infrastructure Thursday.
At the meeting, Representative Ilhan Omar, a Minnesota Democrat, whip of the Chinese Communist Party, told members that she had just been on the phone with Senator Bernie Sanders, who warned that if progressives let the bipartisan bill go through, the House was unlikely to pass The elders of the reconciliation package. Two Democrats serving in swing districts made the same argument in the call, suggesting that anyone who thought the Senate would pass a reconciliation bill without getting a hand was deluding themselves and wouldn’t end up without tangible achievements to run for re-election.
During the call, more than two dozen members spoke, and none of them said they would vote yes on the bipartisan bill. Rep. Katie Porter of California, the so-called Swinging Front Line, urged the other front lines to see the political upside in getting both pieces, arguing that the reconciliation package would bring immediate benefits. “These are things that will immediately begin to improve the lives of Americans and will immediately begin to improve our economy,” Porter said Tell Washington Post In an interview on Tuesday, making a similar point. “Members of Democrats, no matter what your district makes up, that’s what voters want.”
After the meeting, Sanders announced his position.
I strongly urge my colleagues in the House of Representatives to vote against the bipartisan infrastructure bill until Congress passes a strong reconciliation bill.
– Bernie Sanders September 28, 2021
In response to a question about Sanders’ position, Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Reporters On Capitol Hill I agreed. “We had a deal,” she said, referring to the party’s two-track strategy that some centrists are working to upend.
Porter told the newspaper she would oppose the bill on Thursday “If there is no framework and agreement on how to move forward.” Other progressives, including Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., have pointed to such a “framework,” which could be the way Pelosi pushes through an infrastructure bill without completing reconciliation. But relying solely on a framework and agreement risks sacrificing leverage without ensuring that both projects will move forward.
Meanwhile, Senator Joe Manchin, DW.Va, has Refused to even provide the highest spending figure for the reconciliation bill, even after Biden asked him for one at last week’s White House meeting. Without agreement on how much spending Manchin can afford, there is no chance of anything resembling the framework.
And when Pelosi was asked about Sanders encouraging Democrats to oppose the bill, she indicated that she was not pressuring members to vote yes on it. “Everyone has to do what they have to do and I respect that,” She said. “We are doing our job.” There is no evidence that Pelosi has whipped her broader Democratic caucus on the issue.
In June, when Biden split his infrastructure proposals into two separate bills in order to win bipartisan support, Pelosi promised that the bipartisan infrastructure bill would not be voted on in the House without the reconciliation bill. On Monday, the spokesperson backed away from that promise, saying at a party meeting that the infrastructure bill would be put to a vote on Thursday, citing an ambiguity and flexible Highway Financing Deadline.
But with 24 representatives committing to vote publicly against the infrastructure bill Thursday, and at least 10 more committed privately, Pelosi will not have the 218 representatives needed to pass the bill. Leadership of the Republican House Skin Members against the legislation, even if eight Republican members of the House who are calling They will vote for the bill, but will not have the support of the majority.
“We remain fully committed to passing President Biden’s entire agenda to Building Back Better and delivering the transformative change that people across this country urgently want, need, and deserve. Moving forward without the Building Back Better Act would place long-overdue investments in child care, and paid time off, health care, affordable housing, pre-kindergarten, community college, climate action, a citizenship roadmap for dreamers, TPS recipients, and basic.” CPC President Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., said in a statment After the party group meeting on Tuesday.
Pelosi had told a group of Democrats led by New Jersey Representative Josh Gottheimer that the infrastructure bill would be voted on on Monday, September 27, but decided to postpone until Thursday because He had no votes to pass.
Representative Peter DeFazio, deputy chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, is tasked with managing the infrastructure bill on the House floor, but is also a member of the Progressive Caucus and has Throw the bill frequently Reporters in recent days. When asked about his vote, a DeFazio spokesperson replied, “I think the president’s words speak for themselves. In fact, he’s running the bill in the House floor now.” But on the ground, he hailed the bill as historic, making his position ambiguous.