Alphabetize your CSS declaration – Eric Bailey

  • Home / Web Development / Alphabetize your CSS…

Alphabetize your CSS declaration – Eric Bailey

Here are some schools of thought when it comes to customizing your CSS ads. Each approach uses a basic concept to enforce a specific declaration order.

When I ask to organize the announcements, I am talking about the CSS code placed inside the selectors, not the approach to organize the SaaS Parties.

Two examples of CSS declarations that come to mind are:

  1. Jonathan Snook’s SMACSS.
  2. Anton Kurzunov’s Style Lent – Semantic Groups.

There are as many other examples as there are thoughts and purposes. Really as someone, Really In CSS, I wish I could enthusiastically recommend a point of view other than the alphabet. However, I am unfortunately here to tell you.

The most common declaration organization technique I have completed is nothing. I say this at the behest of an experienced consultant who has worked on a number of project codebases spread across a variety of organizations and departments.

We don’t need eyes to see where we are going

I have seen the CSS order added under the selector. I have noticed that CSS has added properties everywhere by order until the correct item is visible in the browser. I have ordered CSS through a stack of irrelevant and inactive copy / paste code from Stack Overflow. I have seen CSS being developed from generation to generation under the influence of the investigative framework. I have even seen a number of perspectives on how employees work through generations of work, revealing it only in teasing the story rather than in messages of commitment.

The problem is that CSS is still misunderstood, underestimated and dismissed as a minor concern. The fact is that it is a programming language that is used to shape ideas.

We live in a very visual culture. If your product doesn’t make a penny if it doesn’t have a polished, visible shape to communicate value.

Unless developers are motivated to take CSS more seriously and understand its full potential, we are stuck in a weird loop where it is good to introduce a lot of complexity into your project’s CSS. Can do more harm than good.

Other programming languages ​​share this meta issue. Too much analysis or smart code means it becomes increasingly difficult to understand, maintain, debug or expand existing work. It also means that someone has more ramp up time to speed up a project.It’s not like we’re doing much in it These days).

If you can’t be right, at least be permanent

I recommend the alphabetical order because it imposes a basic sense of structure throughout the team. This is usually enough to ask, especially if it means cleaning up what has come up before.

It’s so easy to repeat and alphabet the organization as a convention without spending too much time building the whole team on CSS theory.

This is a twist because investing in CSS theory leads to better overall results. she does. Advertising organizations communicate from a point of view in addition to the alphabet, and therefore teach more modern concepts of CSS.

Trying to direct

The last thing I want to do is set my client to fail. It’s hard to recommend any point of view that I don’t think the organization has the capacity to sustain after the engagement is over, even if I personally think the point is better.

I think this is an important thing that many people misunderstand. You want to create something sustainable, but don’t put your energy into making it the wrong way to fulfill your personal desires.

Why teach someone something?

You want to create understandable solutions, but also repetitive ones. Its shape varies from individual to individual.

A big part of doing this well is known to be communication which is known to be able to be internalized and maintained. If you’re lucky, that’s enough to foster a spirit of inquiry that will open the door to more innovative ideas.

Large distribution

Unfortunately, I don’t see CSS-powered needles being taken any more seriously anytime soon. That means I’m stuck in this loop with everyone, even though CSS is getting better.

As far as the first point of the code is concerned, that’s not the point. This is a scenario where the features of the platform are being misused due to the blockchain we have built around learning.

These concerns are not abstract, scientific quibbles. They have a direct impact on things like performance and accessibility, concerns that directly map the use of a website or web app from a person’s experience (or lack thereof).

Don’t be silly

I am reluctant to refer to developers, especially new ones, because of this shortcoming. As an industry we do a terrible job teaching anything other than JavaScript. I am also reluctant to blame schools. They teach what the market demands, which we need to break another loop.

We can do much better than hope that a handful of people break the cycle of corruption javagrifters Hunting the ignorant.

We need better educational infrastructure for design and development of learning. I think a big part of it is regularizing trade apprenticeships, but this is a different post for a different day.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

x