A Colorado web designer who refuses to create same-sex marriage websites loses appeal in court.

A Colorado web designer who did not want to create marriage websites for same-sex couples has lost the appeal of the state’s anti-discrimination law.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit rejects 303 creative owner Lori Smith’s challenge to state law on constitutional grounds.

The appeal comes three years after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a baker in the same state who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.

Writing for the majority, Court of Appeals Judge Mary Beck Bresco agreed with the dissenting judge, including “diversity of beliefs and religious practices,” Smith wrote, “Strengthening Society.”

But the judge wrote that while Smith’s rights to free speech and free exercise were “forced,” he did not repeal Colorado’s anti-discrimination law.

Smith was represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a non-profit conservative Christian advocacy group that argued that decision-making power His client Publishing websites that violate its religious beliefs.

“The government should not force creative professionals to promote a message or cause they do not agree with,” said John Brush, ADF’s senior counselor and vice president of appellate advocacy, in a statement following the decision. ۔

ADF General Counsel Kirsten Wagner, who represents Smith, said the group intends to appeal the decision to the US Supreme Court.

In a statement via ADF, Smith said she “works with everyone” but does not promote “all messages” through her design.

“Just because artists talk about a point of view doesn’t mean they need to promote a point of view. The government is not just telling me what I can’t say. The court’s decision and all. What message do Americans stand for? “Smith said.

In his opposition, Chief Justice Timothy Timkovich wrote: The majority opinion “supports considerable government interference in matters of speech, religion and conscience.”

“The constitution does not force Ms. Smith to compromise her beliefs, nor does it condone the government to do so,” he wrote. “In fact, this case makes it very clear why we have the First Amendment. Properly implemented, the Constitution tells Ms. Smith what the government should say or do.”

According to Smith Roy, LGBTQ was ready to create graphics or websites for users, but he refused. To create marriage websites for same-sex couples, a service he intended to launch in heterosexual unions.

Disputes between the business owner’s religious beliefs and LGBTQ rights, related to the sale of goods and services, have been hotly debated in court in recent years, most notably the Masterpiece Cake Shop vs. Colorado Civil Rights in a Supreme Court decision. Commission.

Although the court ruled in favor of the bakery, it did not resolve major constitutional questions about religious freedom.

Last month, a Denver District Court found that Jack Phillips, owner of the Masterpiece Cake Shop, had violated state discrimination laws by refusing to bake a birthday cake for a trans woman.

Since its 2018 ruling, the Supreme Court has refrained from taking up similar cases on a large scale. In 2019, the court sent a similar case, involving an Oregon bakery that refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple, back to the Court of Appeal.

This month, the Supreme Court refused to appeal to Washington State florist Baronel Stitzmann, who refused to arrange flowers for the same-sex couple due to religious concerns. The Washington State Supreme Court had earlier ruled against Stitzman in June, saying his refusal violated anti-discrimination laws.

CNN Wire.
21 and 2021 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Media Company. All rights reserved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.